Unfortunately, the economic success do not always go hand in hand analogous development mentality,

The first striking fact is shrinking indigenous population of developed countries at the same time, a very dynamic demographic growth (and what's that going economic and political) in regions far backward in terms of civilization.
At the peak of its glory, circa 1900 Europeans accounted for 24.7% of the population of the globe, and the total percentage of the world's population under the political control of the West was 44.3%, while the share in world production of finished products disk daesang - up 84.2%. Since then, however, a lot has changed; first Europe and then the United States, began to slowly give way to a new and growing stronger international entities, whether of a single state structure as China (now the second economy in the world, having yet to overtake the United States disk daesang in this decade) and India (the former British colony, which in just a few decades ahead of its former metropolis and today has more than 2x the economy), disk daesang or simply regions defined as a group of closely interlinked smaller states, forming part of the same civilization, such as Petroleum Middle East countries. [1]
As shown in the above tables, disk daesang the Europeans are now only 10.5% of the population of the world, so that by 2050 their share dropped even further, and settled within disk daesang single digits-7%. The highest population density was and will continue in Asia, mainly due to China and India (about 60%); whereas what needs to quit especially here in the eyes of a promotion to second place Africa's most populous continent in 1999, spacer Europe from year to year (currently it is the ratio: 1.052 billion-740 million), would soon reach approximately 20% of the global population (ie, about 1.7 - 2 billion people).
The problem of the size of the population of the country / region, or more broadly, the problem of population size being a part of the civilization is so important issue that exercises a decisive influence on the role and position of the group in the global, political and economic hierarchy of international actors.
The fact that Europe once dominated the greater part of the globe, due essentially to its human capital, measured not only its quality, but also the size of the absolute. Anyway, just look at contemporary rankings to quickly realize a positive correlation between the size of a country's population and the size of the economy, which in turn translates directly into its broad sense political force (and military) and the same position in the international arena.
Unfortunately, the nature of things it often means also some potential threats to the stability and even the very existence and development of the entire human species; because as far as responsibility and no matter how corny it sounds-good governance in the implementation of major international centers can improve the quality of our existence, this inefficiency is able to destroy everything. This is a fundamental problem, which will be the future of every implication literally living being on the planet.
The graph shows the percentage of individual international disk daesang actors in the global economy in 2000 and 2010. Should pay attention to the declining contribution to the economies of the EU and the United States, and the growing participation of third countries, such as China and India.
While Europe and the U.S. economy disk daesang to grow an average of 1.48% (2000-2012) and 2.2% (2000-2012) a year, for comparison, China's economy hurtling pace of about 10% per year (1999-2013), India (1999 - 2013) - 7%, and Africa about 4.5% (1999 to 2012). To this must be added that Africa was the fastest growing continent economically in 2013-5.6%, with the rate of growth for sub-Saharan Africa compared to the North was even higher and amounted to 6%. [8]
If we assume that the PRC economy today would be as effective as the U.S. economy, its GDP (PPP) would amount to an astonishing value of about 64 trillion! In turn, the economy of India and Brazil, with the same assumptions, turns 54 trillion and 9 trillion (For comparison, the GDP of Europe's largest economies-Germany is 3.325 trillion, while the EU - 17,267 trillion, trillion US-16724).
Unfortunately, the economic success do not always go hand in hand analogous development mentality, for example Petroleum Middle East countries like Qatar, disk daesang Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (of Iran, not to mention), despite its incredible economic progress after the Second World War, behind their facade of modern centers of luxury and style capitalism, it still looks medieval religious dogmatism disk daesang connected to the system of state straight from the era of Louis XIV-and that's assuming that we look at this relatively mild
In turn, Africa, despite the fact that it has immense natural disk daesang wealth in the form of various materials - from gold and diamonds starting after oil, platinum, and uranium - unfortunately, due to its civilization