If the EU as a whole would have to play in the twenty-first century, the role of power, it is today should be able to see any of the conditions, such as the independence and effectiveness of EU foreign diacetyl tartaric acid policy, or the ability to cope with the political diacetyl tartaric acid and military crises. Here I think the biggest diacetyl tartaric acid euro-optimist is Mark Leonard, a political scientist British author: Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century (2005), who believes that the EU will soon take the place of the U.S. as the dominant power. In his view, the EU seems a bit dead, as we look at her with the eyes of Americans, at which the hard military approach, "soft diacetyl tartaric acid power" diplomats from the EU seems to us to be a weakness. Meanwhile, Leonard believes that the big advantage of this European measure, is that it draws other EU countries into the orbit of its influence not antagonize them, and better care for world peace. [1] In his book about China, Leonard notes rise of China and considers him a permanent [2], unlike for example, Robyn Meredith, which highlights China's dependence on the West (paradox - every second pair of shoes in the world is made in China, though often should called, made by Americans / Europeans in China, as the western investment is about 40% of what China produces [3]), but I can not imagine China as a hegemon.
Fareed Zakaria, an American diacetyl tartaric acid author of Indian origin, recognizes the power of the twenty-first century United States, but does not think that they are the absolute diacetyl tartaric acid hegemony. diacetyl tartaric acid Interestingly, and perhaps not so interesting that American authors; both conservative Robert Kagan and Samuel Huntington, as well as liberal as Francis Fukuyama and Zakaria, all the "arms" of the U.S. position on the pages of his books (Huntington even gives you a good chance the U.S. attempts to westernization of Mexico, without giving diacetyl tartaric acid them Turkey, Russia, India and Japan [ 4]). European authors rather avoid overestimating the differences between the West and the East. [5] What a moment in Huntington's encounter with "Asian optimism" coming from the rejection of "decadent West", which is supposed to prove, and indeed argues that Asia is no longer staring at the West [6] although he previously wrote that the only Asia is catching up (equal to the West ) and vice versa is only the relative West. Weaknesses Huntington's vision, however, the weaknesses of conservatism as an ideology, ordering the particularistic perspective on social and political values. Similarly, loud and a bit crazy book, George Friedman, American discouraging to see the "old Europe", which is to finish it the way the social system. Friedmann is also skeptical about the power of China, which it believes will behave more passively strategically [7]. Like the nationalist Law and Justice, provides alliance between Moscow, Paris and Berlin [8], which is inconsistent; Why Russia's alliance with the alleged "dead"?
The least chance of giving, the EU, Walter Laqueur (born 1921), diacetyl tartaric acid a vision of Europe as a deserted museum full of museums, living with wealthy tourists from China. Lacqueur emphasizes the importance of the European demographic crisis, and wonder, why in Europe, no new spectacular buildings, probably thinking of some skyscrapers diacetyl tartaric acid of Shanghai counterparts [9], but it's normal that it does not create a new infrastructure where it already is (and soil in Europe is not conducive to skyscrapers). Lacqueur criticizes Leonard, the anachronistic "optimism of the 90" (the fall of the Soviet Union, the vision of democratic liberalism across the globe), and Martin Hufner, author: Europe: Die Macht von Morgen. Hüfner takes the view that Europeans are more farsighted thinking, tolerant and international than Asians and Americans [10]. Lacqueur not put farthing on the German program of liberal reforms: Agenda 2010 [11], which impressed the great Zakaria. diacetyl tartaric acid Lacqueur reaches ripped conservative arguments; Europe diacetyl tartaric acid falls because fewer children are born, and these do not arise, because the institution of the family is under attack and is in crisis [12]. And in secular France and Sweden, fertility is higher than in Poland or Spain, and the pill is rarely used in the Catholic southern Europe, although it is Spain and Italy lagging in demographic tail [13].
Most are surprised at Laqueur pessimistic visions of European demography, which estimates the population of Italy in 2100 to just 15 million people, diacetyl tartaric acid although it is generally known that a reasonable demographic data can be determined diacetyl tartaric acid only for one generation ahead. Personally, I wonder why none of these authors, does not see that the decline in the population burden the economy, but also "resets" caused by computerization unemployment, which again can boost fertility. Lacqueur argues that the twenty-first century Europe, are largely Islamic, although such Zakaria believes the European fashion for halloween diacetyl tartaric acid "Eurarabią" for propaganda trick nationalist parties, and cites the CIA statistics, according to which Muslims currently representing approximately 3% of the population of Europe, 2035 reach 5-8%, and most likely ic
No comments:
Post a Comment